We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
As the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The ruling in the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts until finally or unless either new legislation is created, or possibly a higher court rules differently.
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners might search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
For that foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order concerning cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were explained to of the boy’s past, they requested if their children were Risk-free with him in their home. The therapist confident them that they had very little to worry about.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation involves the names in the parties to the first case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it absolutely was decided, as well as book in which it is actually recorded. Different citation requirements might contain italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It's also a well-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may interfere with the summary or the finding and mold the relief to make it proper towards the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified because of the decision on the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are definitely the opinions that are filed to the day that the appellate court issues its decision and will often be not the court's final opinion.
Statutory laws are People created by legislative bodies, like Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this style of legislation strives to condition our society, delivering rules and guidelines, it would be unattainable for virtually any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is properly set up now that the provision for proforma promotion will not be alien or unfamiliar into the civil servant service framework but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it can be lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may perhaps if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled to become promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to the Federation/ province within the higher post, direct that this sort of read more civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of these types of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Criminal cases In the common regulation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil regulation systems, common law systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their personal previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduce courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts.